Father's Demand Prosecution Of Family Court

Fathers’ Demand Prosecution of Family Court Judges For Violations of Fathers’ Constitutional Rights


Family court judges who violated the constitutional rights of litigants (and any other officers of the court such as lawyers who can be shown to have lied in court to the significant harm of fathers or their children) shall be prosecuted. Indictments shall be issued based on probable violations of such individuals as brought to committees of fathers designated to initiate actions against these ‘war–on–fathers’ criminals.

Justification of this prosecution

Family court judges swore to uphold both the U.S. Constitution and their own state constitutions. The very nature of their courts, the bench trial process and their judgments show clear violations of their oaths. They must be prosecuted for those violations.

This is most important because our constitutional rights -fought for by fathers and men since the inception of this country - demands it, the importance of liberty demands it, accountability demands it, the untold persecution and irreparable harm it brought onto fathers and their children demands it, and, lastly, the avoidance of an all-out revolution demands it. We either have a nation of laws - or we have a nation run by the legal aristocracy and their privileged affiliates and conspirators in treason contriving phony, clearly constitutionally illegal laws to tyrannize fathers.

In addition to denying fit fathers their children, family court judges have imposed virtual slavery upon them to support the very system that tyrannizes them. Judges have violated the laws against involuntary servitude and peonage:

Involuntary servitude:  Section 1584 of Title 18 makes it unlawful to hold a person in a condition of slavery, that is, a condition of compulsory service of labor against his will. A section 1584 conviction requires that the victim be held against his will by actual force, threats of force, or threats of legal coercion. Section 1584 also prohibits compelling a person to work against his will by creating a ‘climate of fear’ through the use of force, threat of force, or the threat of legal coercion which is sufficient to compel service against a person’s will.

Peonage: Section 1581 of Title 18 makes it unlawful to hold a person in ‘debt servitude’ or peonage, which is closely related to involuntary servitude. Section 1581 prohibits using force, threat of force, or the threat of legal coercion to compel a person to work against his will. In addition, the victim’s involuntary servitude must be tied to the payment of a debt.

These federal laws clearly describe the condition imposed on fathers by Family Court judges. They have destroyed families, perverted children, and robbed fathers of their wealth. These judges have committed treason.

When a judge deliberately and knowingly breaks constitutional law to attend to his own agenda by violating a litigant’s rights, that judge has committed treason, for he has usurped the power of the Constitution to which he is bound by law and sworn oath, without exception or condition. Such criminal acts may well be construed and interpreted as an attempt to violently overthrow the U.S. government because the judiciary is employing the use of heavily armed 'peace officers' to enforce his unconstitutional orders and jail sentences.

Constitutionally valid laws regarding what treason is, drafted subsequently under the authority of the Constitution are all very clear. When one or class of people attempts to enforce some other brand of law other than the Constitution, he or they are operating unlawfully under influence of an unlawful doctrine.

David Sobell of Needham, MA states, "...Sadly the courts and their sycophants rely upon the ignorance a indifference of the general public to facilitate their imperious rule. They display a lack of empathy toward divorced fathers (many of whom are subjected to degrading and humiliating court decrees). This is cruel and abusive. The courts and their willing executioners truly represent a judicial holocaust [of fathers and families].”

Judges who have incarcerated fathers - the bottom line enforcement procedure of their extortion process - without the necessary due process will be prosecuted first. They have committed high crimes against fathers because jury trials are ‘a must’ when holding a trial for civil contempt where "clear and convincing" evidence must be produced -"The jury...acts not only as a safeguard against judicial excesses, but also as a barrier to legislative and executive oppression. The Supreme Court recognizes that the jury...is designed to protect defendants against oppressive governmental practices" United States EX Rel Toth v. Quarles, 350 U.S. 11, 16 (1955).

Family court judges have maliciously ignored Supreme Court rulings on such issues.

The vast scale of family destruction, the obvious malicious rulings and denials of fathers’ rights that family court judges have participated is undeniable. Hiding behind the ruse of ‘best interest of children’ or ‘safety of women’ to implement their maliciousness is akin to the excuse and tactics of the worse war criminals.

Not to prosecute family court judges is the same as not prosecuting war criminals for the atrocities they committed in the face of fairness, justices and liberty.